EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues No 79 (2013) Mov Sport Sci/Sci Mot, 79 (2013) 33-41 References
Issue
Mov Sport Sci/Sci Mot
Number 79, 2013
Page(s) 33 - 41
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/sm/2012032
Published online 13 December 2012
  • Ashford, D., Bennett, S.J., & Davids, K. (2006). Observational modeling effects for movement dynamics and movement outcome measures across differing task constraints : A meta-analysis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 38, 185–205. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ashford, D., Davids, K., & Bennett, S.J. (2007). Developmental effects influencing observational modeling : A meta-analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25, 547–558. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bandura, A.J. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action : A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
  • Bandura, A.J. (1997). Self-efficacy : The exercise of control. New York, NY : W.H. Freeman. [Google Scholar]
  • Beveridge Mackie, J. (2011). Modern Journalism : A handbook of instruction and counsel for the young journalist. Charleston, SC : Nabu Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2002). Self-controlled feedback : Does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73, 408–415. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Clark, S.E., & Ste-Marie, D.M. (2007). The impact of self-as-a-model interventions on children’s self-regulation of learning and swimming performance. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25, 577–586. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Clark, S.E., Ste-Marie, D., & Martini, R. (2006). The thought processes underlying self-as-a-model interventions : An exploratory study. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7, 381–386. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cumming, J., Clark, S.E., Ste-Marie, D.M., McCullagh, P., & Hall, C. (2005). The functions of observational learning questionnaire (FOLQ). Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 6, 517–537. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow : The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY : Harper & Row. [Google Scholar]
  • Dowrick, P.W. (1999). A review of self-modeling and related interventions. Applied and Preventative Psychology, 8, 23–29. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Feltz, D.L., Short, S.E., & Sullivan, P.J. (2008). Self-efficacy in sport : Research and strategies for working with athletes, teams, and coaches. Champaign, IL : Human Kinetics. [Google Scholar]
  • Fitts, P.M., & Posner, I.M. (1967). Human performance. Belmont, CA : Brooks Cole. [Google Scholar]
  • Franks, I.M., & Maile, L.J. (1991). The use of video in sport skill acquisition. In P.W. Dowrick (Ed.), Practical guide to using video in the behavioral sciences (pp. 231–243). New York, NY : Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  • Hansen, S., Pfeiffer, J., & Patterson, J.T. (2011). Self-control of feedback during motor learning : Accounting for the absolute amount of feedback using a yoked group with self-control over feedback. Journal of Motor Behavior, 43, 113–119. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hodges, N.J., Williams, A.M., Hayes, S.J., & Breslin, G. (2007). What is modeled during observational learning? Journal of Sports Sciences, 25, 531–545. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Janelle, C.M., Barba, D.A., Frechlich, S.G., Tennant, I.K., & Cauraugh, J.H. (1997). Maximizing performance effectiveness through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 269–279. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Keetch, K.M., & Lee, T.D. (2007). The effect of self-regulated and experimenter-imposed practice schedules on motor learning for tasks of varying difficulties. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 78, 476–486. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Law, B., & Ste-Marie, D.M. (2005). Effects of self-modeling on figure skating jump performance and psychological variables. European Journal of Sport Science, 5, 143–152. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Locke, E.A., & Latham, G.P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
  • Martini, R., Rymal, A., & Ste-Marie, D.M. (2011). Investigating self-as-a-model techniques and underlying cognitive processes in adults learning the butterfly swim stroke. International Journal of Sport Sciences and Engineering, 5, 242–256. [Google Scholar]
  • Patterson, J.T., & Carter, M. (2010). Learner regulated knowledge of results during the acquisition of multiple timing goals. Human Movement Science, 29, 214–227. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ram, N., & McCullagh, P. (2003). Self-modeling : Influence on psychological responses and physical performance. The Sport Psychologist, 17, 220–241. [Google Scholar]
  • Rothstein, A.L., & Arnold, R.K. (1976). Bridging the gap : Application of research on videotape feedback and bowling. Motor Skills : Theory into Practice, 1, 35–62. [Google Scholar]
  • Rymal, A.M., Martini, R., & Ste-Marie, D.M. (2010). Self-regulatory processes employed during self-modeling : A qualitative analysis. The Sport Psychologist, 24, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  • Schmidt, R.A., & Bjork, R.A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice : common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3, 207–217. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schunk, D.H., & Hanson, A.R. (1989). Self-modeling and children’s cognitive skill learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 155-163. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Starek, J., & McCullagh, P. (1999). The effect of self-modeling on the performance of beginner swimmers. The Sport Psychologist, 13, 269–287. [Google Scholar]
  • Ste-Marie, D.M., Rymal, A.M., Vertes, K., & Martini, R. (2011). Self-modeling and competitive beam performance enhancement. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 23, 292–307. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ste-Marie, D.M., Vertes, K., Rymal, A.M., & Martini, R. (2011). Feedforward self-modeling enhances skill acquisition in children learning trampoline skills. Frontiers in Psychology : Movement Science and Sport Psychology, 2, DOI 10.3389/psyg. 2011.00155. [Google Scholar]
  • Ste-Marie, D.M., Law, B., Rymal, A.M., Jenny, O., Hall, C., & McCullagh, P. (2012). Observation interventions for motor skill learning and performance : A framework for the use of observational modeling. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 5, 145–176. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weiss, M.R., & Klint, K.A. (1987). “Show and Tell” in the gymnasium : An investigation of developmental differences in modeling and verbal rehearsal of motor skills. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 58, 234–241. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weiss, M. (1983). Modeling and motor performance : A development perspective. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 54, 190–197. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weiss, M.R., Bredemeier, B.J., & Shewchuk, R.M. (1985). An intrinsic/extrinsic motivation scale for the youth sport setting : A confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Sports Psychology, 7, 75–91. [Google Scholar]
  • Weiss, M.R., Ebbeck, V., & Weise-Bjornstal, D.M. (1993). Developmental and psychological factors related to children’s observational learning of physical skills. Pediatric Exercise Science, 5, 301–317. [Google Scholar]
  • Winfrey, M., & Weeks, D. (1993). Effects of self-modeling on self-efficacy and balance beam performance. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 77, 907–913. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zimmerman, B.J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329–339. [Google Scholar]
  • Zimmerman, B.J. (2000). Attainment of self-regulation : a social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA : Academic Press. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.