Free Access
Mov Sport Sci/Sci Mot
Number 106, 2019
Page(s) 19 - 26
Published online 04 September 2019
  • Ames, C. (1992). Achievement goals, motivational climate, and motivational processes. In G.C. Roberts (Ed.), Motivation in sport and exercise (pp. 161–176). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. [Google Scholar]
  • Carver, C.S., & Scheier, M.F. (1982). Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychological Bulletin , 92(1), 111–135. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen, H., Cohen, P., & Chen, S. (2010). How big is a big odds ratio? Interpreting the magnitudes of odds ratios in epidemiological studies. Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation® , 39(4), 860–864. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chernev, A. (2004). Goal orientation and consumer preference for the status quo. Journal of Consumer Research , 31, 557–565 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Debanne, T. (2003). Activité perceptive et décisionnelle du gardien de but de handball lors de la parade : les savoirs d’experts. Staps , 3, 43–58. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Debanne, T., & Laffaye, G. (2015). Motivational cues predict the defensive system in team handball: A model based on regulatory focus theory. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports , 25, 558–567. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Debanne, T., & Laffaye, G. (2017). Effects of game location, quality of opposition, number of foreign players and anthropometric factors in elite handball games. Kinesiology , 49(2), 194–201. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Debanne T., Angel V., Fontayne P. (2014). Decision-making during games by professional handball coaches using regulatory focus theory. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology , 6, 111–124. [Google Scholar]
  • Debanne, T., Laffaye, G. & Trouilloud, D., (2018). Motivational orientations and performance in penalty throws during elite male team handball games. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports , 28, 1288–1294. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Förster, J., Higgins, E.T., & Idson, L.C. (1998). Approach and avoidance strength during goal attainment: Regulatory focus and the “goal looms larger” effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 75, 1115–1131. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Harris, D.J., & Atkinson, G. (2009). Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research. International Journal of Sports Medicine , 30, 701–702. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Higgins, E.T. (1989). Self-discrepancy theory: What patterns of self-beliefs cause people to suffer?. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 22, pp. 93–136). New York: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Higgins, E.T. (1996). Emotional experiences: The pains and pleasures of distinct regulatory systems. In R.D. Kavanaugh, B. Zimmerberg, & S. Fein (Eds.), Emotion: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 203–241). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]
  • Higgins, E.T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist , 52, 1280–1300. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Higgins, E.T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist , 55, 1217–1230. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Higgins, E.T. (2005). Value from regulatory fit. Current Directions in Psychological Science , 14, 209–213. [Google Scholar]
  • Higgins, E.T., Shah, J., Friedman, R. (1997). Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 72(3), 515–525. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jordet, G. (2009). Why do English players fail in soccer penalty shootouts? A study of team status, self-regulation, and choking under pressure. Journal of Sports Sciences , 27, 97–106. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jordet, G., & Hartman, E. (2008). Avoidance motivation and choking under pressure in soccer penalty shootouts. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology , 30, 450–457. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lyle, J. (2003). Stimulated recall: A report on its use in naturalistic research. British Educational Research Journal , 29, 861–878. [Google Scholar]
  • Martin, J.-C. (2015). La bible de la communication non-verbale. Paris : Leduc éditions. [Google Scholar]
  • Memmert, D., Hüttermann, S., & Orliczek, J. (2013). Decide like Lionel Messi! The impact of regulatory focus on divergent thinking in sports. Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 43(10), 2163–2167. [Google Scholar]
  • Plessner, H., Unkelbach, C., Memmert, D., Baltes, A. & Kolb, A. (2009). Regulatory fit as a determinant of sport performance. Psychology of Sport & Exercise , 10, 108–115. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shah, J., Higgins, E.T., & Friedman, R.S. (1998). Performance incentives and means: How regulatory focus influences goal attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 74, 285–93. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Renkema, L., & Van Yperen, N. (2008). “On goals and strategies: How a fit between performance goals and regulatory strategies affects performance”. Revue internationale de psychologie sociale , 21(1), 97–107. [Google Scholar]
  • Unkelbach, C., Plessner, H., & Memmert, D. (2009). “Fit” in sports: Self-regulation and athletic performances. In J.P. Forgas, R.F. Baumeister, & D.M. Tice (Eds.), Psychology of self-regulation: Cognitive, affective, and motivational processes (pp. 93–105). New York: Psychology Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Vogel, T., & Genshow, O. (2013). When do chronic differences in self-regulation count?: Regulatory focus effects in easy and difficult soccer tasks. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology , 35, 216–220. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Worthy, D.A., Markman, A.B., & Maddox, W.T. (2009). Choking and excelling at the free throw line. The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving , 19, 53–58. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.