Free Access
Mov Sport Sci/Sci Mot
Number 108, 2020
Page(s) 23 - 31
Published online 08 January 2020
  • Atienza, F., Balaguer, I., & Garcia-Merita, M.L. (1994). Factor analysis and reliability of the movement imagery questionnaire. Perceptual and Motor Skills , 78, 1323–1328. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Barr, K., & Hall, C.R. (1992). The use of imagery by rowers. International Journal of Sport Psychology , 23, 243–261. [Google Scholar]
  • Budnik-Przybylska, D., Szczypińska, M., & Karasiewicz, K. (2016). Reliability and validity of the Polish version of the Movement Imagery Questionnaire-3 (MIQ-3). Current Issues in Personality Psychology , 4(4), 253–267. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Byrne, B.M. (1989). A primer of LISREL: Basic application programming for confirmatory factor analytic models. New York: Springer-Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  • Callow, N., & Hardy, L. (2004). The relationship between the use of kinaesthetic imagery and different visual imagery perspectives. Journal of Sports Sciences , 22(2), 167–177. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Callow, N., Jiang, D., Roberts, R., & Edwards, M.G. (2017). Kinesthetic imagery provides additive benefits to internal imagery on slalom task performance. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology , 39(1), 81–86. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar]
  • Cumming, J., & Ramsey, R. (2009). Imagery interventions in sport. In S.D. Mellalieu & S. Hanton (Eds.), Advances in applied sport psychology: A review (pp. 5–36). London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Cumming, J., & Ste-Marie, D.M. (2001). The cognitive and motivational effects of imagery training: A matter of perspective. The Sport Psychologist , 15, 276–287. [Google Scholar]
  • Cumming, J., & Williams, S.E. (2012). Imagery: The role of imagery in performance. In S. Murphy (Ed.), Oxford handbook of sport and performance psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Fishburne, G., & Hall, C. (1989). Imagery ability and movement. In M. Lashuk (Ed.), Proceedings of the Alberta Teacher Educators in Physical Education, 3rd Annual meeting (pp. 9–23). Calgary Publication. [Google Scholar]
  • Fitts, P.M. (1964). Perceptual motor skills learning. In A.W. Melton (Ed.), Categories of human learning (pp. 243–285). New-York: Academic Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fleishman, E., & Rich, A. (1963). Role of kinesthetic and spatial-visual abilities in perceptual-motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology , 66, 6–11. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Goss, S., Hall, C., & Buckolz, E. (1983). Visual and kinesthetic imagery of movements in elementary school children. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 8, 209. [Google Scholar]
  • Goss, S., Hall, C., Buckolz, E., & Fishburne, G. (1986). Imagery ability and the acquisition and retention of movements. Memory Cognition , 14(6), 469–477. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gregg, M., Hall, C., & Butler, A. (2010). The MIQ-RS: A suitable option for examining movement imagery ability. Evidence Based Complementary and Alternative Medecine , 7, 249–57. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hall, C.R. (2001). Imagery in sport and exercise. In R.N. Singer, H.A. Hausenblas, & C.M. Janelle (Eds.), The handbook of sport psychology (2nd ed., pp. 529–549). New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc. [Google Scholar]
  • Hall, C., & Martin, K. (1997). Measuring movement imagery abilities: A revision of the Movement Imagery Questionnaire. Journal of Mental Imagery , 21(1/2), 143–154. [Google Scholar]
  • Hall, C., & Pongrac, J. (1983). Movement Imagery Questionnaire. London, Ontario: University of Western Ontario. [Google Scholar]
  • Hall, C., Pongrac, J., & Buckolz, E. (1985). The measurement of imagery abilty. Human Movement Science , 4, 107–118. [Google Scholar]
  • Hall, C., Buckolz, E., & Fishburne, G. (1992). Imagery and the acquisition of motor skills. Canadian Journal of Sport Science , 17, 19–27. [Google Scholar]
  • Hall, C.R., Bernoties, L., & Schmidt, D. (1995). Interference effects of mental imagery on a motor task. Brain Journal of Psychology , 86, 181–190. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hardy, L., & Callow, N. (1999). Efficacy of external and internal visual imagery perspectives for the enhancement of performance on tasks in which form is important. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology , 21, 95–112. [Google Scholar]
  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M.R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods , 6, 53–60. [Google Scholar]
  • Jackson, P.L., Meltzoff, A.L., & Decety, J. (2006). Neural circuits involved in imitation and perspective-taking. NeuroImage , 31, 429–439. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jiang, D., Edwards, M.G., Mullins, P., & Callow, N. (2015). The neural substrates for the different modalities of movement imagery. Brain and Cognition , 97, 22–31. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Loison, B., Moussaddaq, S., Cormier, J., Richard, I., Ferrapie, A., Ramond, A., & Dinomais, M. (2013). Translation and validation of the French Movement Imagery Questionnaire –Revised Second version (MIQ-RS). Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine , 56, 157–173. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lorant, J., & Gaillot, L. (2004). Validation de la version francaise du Movement Imagery Questionniare (MIQ). Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement , 36, 30–35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lorant, J., & Nicolas, A. (2004). Validation de la traduction Française du Movement Imagery Questionnaire-Revised (MIQ-R). Science & Motricite , 53, 57–68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lorey, B., Bischoff, M., Pilgramm, S., Stark, R., Munzert, J., & Zentgraf, K. (2009). The embodied nature of motor imagery: The influence of posture and perspective. Experimental Brain Research , 194, 233–243. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mahoney, M.J., & Avener, M. (1977). Psychology of the elite athlete: An exploratory study. Cognitive Therapy Research , 1, 135–141. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McNeish, D. (2018). Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here. Psychological Methods , 23, 412–433. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mendes, P.A., Marinho, D.A., Petrica, J.D., Silveira, P., Monteiro, D., & Cid, L. (2016). Tradução e Validação do Movement Imagery Questionnaire-3 (MIQ-3) com Atletas Portugueses/Translation and Validation of the Movement Imagery Questionnaire-3 (MIQ-3) with Portuguese Athletes. Motricidade , 12(1), 149. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Monsma, E.V., Short, S.E., Hall, C.R., Gregg, M., & Sullivan, P. (2009). Psychometric properties of the revised Movement Imagery Questionnaire (MIQ-R). Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity , 4, 1–12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nezam, S.E., Isazadeh, H., Hojjati, A., & Zadeh, Z.B. (2014) Comparison ability of movement imagery perspectives in elite, sub-elite, and non-elite athletes. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences , 8, 712–716. [Google Scholar]
  • Paravlić, A., Pišot, S., & Mitić, P. (2018). Validation of the Slovenian Version of Motor Imagery Questionnaire 3 (MIQ-3): Promising tool in modern comprehensive rehabilitation practice. Zdravstveno varstvo , 57(4), 201–210. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Roberts, R., Callow, N., Hardy, L., Markland, D., & Bringer, J. (2008). Movement imagery ability: Development and assessment of a revised version of the vividness of movement imagery questionnaire. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology , 30, 200–221. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Robin, N., & Coudevylle, G.R. (2018). The influences of tropical climate, imagery ability, distance and load on walking time. International Journal of Sport Psychology , 3, 66–87. [Google Scholar]
  • Robin, N., Dominique, L., Toussaint, L., Blandin, Y., Guillot, A., & Le Her, M. (2007). Effects of motor imagery training on returning serve accuracy in tennis: The role of imagery ability. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology , 2, 177–188. [Google Scholar]
  • Ruby, P., & Decety, J. (2001). Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: A PET investigation of agency. Nature Neuroscience , 4, 546–550. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rulleau, T., Mauvieux, B., & Toussaint, L. (2015). Influence of circadian rhythms on the temporal features of motor imagery for older adult inpatients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , 96, 1229–1234. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Seiler, B., Monsma, E., & Newman-Norlund, R. (2015). Biological evidence of imagery abilities: Intraindividual differences. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology , 37, 421–35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ungerleider, S., & Golding, J.M. (1991). Mental practice among Olympic athletes. Perceptual and Motor Skills , 72, 1007–1017. [Google Scholar]
  • Vallerand, R.J., & Halliwell, W.R. (1983). Vers une méthodologie de validation transculturelle de questionnaires psychologiques : implications pour la psychologie du sport. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences , 8, 9–18. [Google Scholar]
  • Williams, S.E., & Cumming, J. (2011). Measuring athlete imagery ability: The sport imagery ability questionnaire. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology , 33, 416–440. Available from [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Williams, S., Cumming, J., Ntoumanis, N., Nordin-Bates, S., Ramsey, R., & Hall, C. (2012). Further validation and development of the movement imagery questionnaire. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology , 34, 621–646. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Williams, S.E., Guillot, A., Di Rienzo, F., & Cumming, J. (2015) Comparing self-report and mental chronometry measures of motor imagery ability. European Journal of Sport Science , 15(8), 703–711. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • White, A., & Hardy, L. (1995). Use of different imagery perspectives on the learning and performance of different motor skills. The British Journal of Psychology , 86, 169–180. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.