Body composition and physical performance measures in elite female football players: differences across playing positions and associations with kicking velocity and curve sprint performance | Movement & Sport Sciences

Free Access

Table 5

Pearson’s correlation (r) between linear and curved sprint performance variables in elite female football players.

	T₁₀	T₃₀	Vmax	CS T_8.5 GS	CS T₁₇ GS	CS T_8.5 WS
T₃₀	r = 0.552 P = 0.002
CS T_8.5 GS	r = 0.396 P = 0.045	r = 0.456 P = 0.019	r = −0.520 P = 0.005
CS T₁₇ GS	r = 0.443 P = 0.018	r = 0.649 P < 0.001	r = −0.594 P < 0.001	r = 0.916 P < 0.001
CS T_8.5 WS	r = 0.586 P = 0.002	r = 0.695 P < 0.001	r = −0.445 P = 0.023	r = 0.528 P = 0.006	r = 0.534 P = 0.003
CS T₁₇ WS	r = 0.556 P = 0.006	r = 0.722 P < 0.001	r = −0.585 P < 0.001	r = 0.752 P < 0.001	r = 0.873 P < 0.001	r = 0.802 P < 0.001

Bold: Denotes correlations are significant.

Abbreviations: T₁₀: 10-m sprint time; T₃₀: 30-m sprint time; Vmax: linear sprint maximum velocity; CS: curve sprint; T_8.5: 8.5-m curved sprint time; T₁₇: 17-m curved sprint time; GS and WS: good and weak side.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.