Free Access
| Issue |
Mov Sport Sci/Sci Mot
Number 109, 2020
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 15 - 21 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/sm/2020003 | |
| Published online | 24 March 2020 | |
- Clark, R.A., Bryant, A.L., Pua, Y., McCrory, P., Bennell, K., & Hunt, M. (2010). Validity and reliability of the Nintendo Wii Balance Board for assessment of standing balance. Gait & Posture , 31(3), 307–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.11.012. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dozza, M., Chiari, L., Peterka, R.J., Wall, C., & Horak, F.B. (2011). What is the most effective type of audio-biofeedback for postural motor learning? Gait & Posture , 34(3), 313–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.05.016. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dunham, P., & Mueller, R. (1993). Effect of fading knowledge of results on acquisition, retention, and transfer of a simple motor task. Perceptual and Motor Skills , 77(3 Pt 2), 1187–1192. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1993.77.3f.1187. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Faugloire, E., Bardy, B.G., Merhi, O., & Stoffregen, T.A. (2005). Exploring coordination dynamics of the postural system with real-time visual feedback. Neuroscience Letters , 374(2), 136–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2004.10.043. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fujii, S., Lulic, T., & Chen, J.L. (2016). More feedback is better than less: Learning a novel upper limb joint coordination pattern with augmented auditory feedback. Frontiers in Neuroscience , 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00251. [Google Scholar]
- Hrysomallis, C. (2011). Balance ability and athletic performance. Sports Medicine , 41(3), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.2165/11538560-000000000-00000. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Konttinen, N., Mononen, K., Viitasalo, J., & Mets, T. (2004). The effects of augmented auditory feedback on psychomotor skill learning in precision shooting. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology , 26(2), 306–316. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.26.2.306. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lai, Q., & Shea, C.H. (1998). Generalized Motor Program (GMP) learning: Effects of reduced frequency of knowledge of results and practice variability. Journal of Motor Behavior , 30(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222899809601322. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lakhani, B., & Mansfield, A. (2015). Visual feedback of the centre of gravity to optimize standing balance. Gait & Posture , 41(2), 499–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.12.003. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Larsen, L.R., Jørgensen, M.G., Junge, T., Juul-Kristensen, B., & Wedderkopp, N. (2014). Field assessment of balance in 10 to 14 year old children, reproducibility and validity of the Nintendo Wii board. BMC Pediatrics , 14, 144. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-144. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marco-Ahulló, A., García-Massó, X., García-Osa, C., & Estevan-Torres, I. (2019). Influencia del tipo de feedback utilizado en el aprendizaje de una tarea motriz de equilibrio. Retos , 36(36), 435–440. [Google Scholar]
- McNevin, N.H., Shea, C.H., & Wulf, G. (2003). Increasing the distance of an external focus of attention enhances learning. Psychological Research , 67(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-002-0093-6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park, D.-S., & Lee, G. (2014). Validity and reliability of balance assessment software using the Nintendo Wii balance board: Usability and validation. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation , 11, 99. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-99. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rink, J.E., & Hall, T.J. (2008). Research on effective teaching in elementary school physical education. The Elementary School Journal , 108(3), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1086/529103. [Google Scholar]
- Schmidt, R.A., Young, D.E., Swinnen, S., & Shapiro, D.C. (1989). Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: Support for the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 15(2), 352–359. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sigrist, R., Rauter, G., Riener, R., & Wolf, P. (2013a). Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review , 20(1), 21–53. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0333-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sigrist, R., Rauter, G., Riener, R., & Wolf, P. (2013b). Terminal feedback outperforms concurrent visual, auditory, and haptic feedback in learning a complex rowing-type task. Journal of Motor Behavior , 45(6), 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2013.826169. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Silverman, S. (1991). Research on teaching in physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport , 62(4), 352–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1991.10607533. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sparrow, W.A. (1995). Acquisition and retention effects of reduced relative frequency of knowledge of results. Australian Journal of Psychology , 47(2), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049539508257507. [Google Scholar]
- Sparrow, W.A., & Summers, J.J. (1992). Performance on trials without knowledge results (KR) in reduced relative frequency presentations of KR. Journal of Motor Behavior , 24(2), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1992.9941615. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sullivan, K.J., Kantak, S.S., & Burtner, P.A. (2008). Motor learning in children: Feedback effects on skill acquisition. Physical Therapy , 88(6), 720–732. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20070196. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tan, S. K.S. (1996). Differences between experienced and inexperienced physical education teachers’ augmented feedback and interactive teaching decisions. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education , 15(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.15.2.151. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Viciana, J., Cervelló, E., Ramírez, J., San-Matías, J., & Requena, B. (2010). Influence of positive and negative feedback high school students in climate ego-task perceived, considering the pe and complexity preference in jobs class. European Journal of Human Movement , 10(0). [Google Scholar]
- Weeks, D.L., & Kordus, R.N. (1998). Relative frequency of knowledge of performance and motor skill learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport , 69(3), 224–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1998.10607689. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Winstein, C.J., & Schmidt, R.A. (1990). Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 16(4), 677–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.677. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wishart, L.R., & Lee, T.D. (1997). Effects of aging and reduced relative frequency of knowledge of results on learning a motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills , 84(3 Pt 1), 1107–1122. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1997.84.3.1107. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wulf, G., Shea, C.H., & Matschiner, S. (1998). Frequent feedback enhances complex motor skill learning. Journal of Motor Behavior , 30(2), 180–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222899809601335. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wulf, G., Chiviacowsky, S., Schiller, E., & Ávila, L.T.G. (2010). Frequent external-focus feedback enhances motor learning. Frontiers in Psychology , 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00190. [Google Scholar]
- Wulf, G., & Schmidt, R.A. (1989). The learning of generalized motor programs: Reducing the relative frequency of knowledge of results enhances memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 15(4), 748–757. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.4.748. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Zijlstra, A., Mancini, M., Chiari, L., & Zijlstra, W. (2010). Biofeedback for training balance and mobility tasks in older populations: A systematic review. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation , 7, 58. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-7-58. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.