Accès gratuit
Mov Sport Sci/Sci Mot
Numéro 97, 2017
Technologies et techniques des sports : le regard de l’histoire et des sciences humaines et sociales
Page(s) 17 - 25
Publié en ligne 23 août 2017
  • Berger, R.J. (2004). Pushing forward: Disability, basketball, and me. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 794–810. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Berger, R.J. (2008). Disability and the dedicated wheelchair athlete: Beyond the “supercrip” critique. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 37(6), 647–678. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Burkett, B. (2010). Technology in Paralympic sport: Performance enhancement or essential for. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 44, 215–220. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Butryn, T.M. (2002). Cyborg horizons: Sport and the ethics of self-technologization. In A. Miah & S. Easson (Eds.), Sport, technology: History, philosophy, and policy (pp. 111–134). Oxford: Elsevier Science. [Google Scholar]
  • Butryn, T.M. (2003). Posthuman podiums: Cyborg narratives of elite track and field athletes. Sociology of Sport Journal, 20, 17–39. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Charles, J.M. (1998). Technology and the body of knowledge. Quest, 50, 379–388. [Google Scholar]
  • Cole, C.L. (1993). Resisting the canon: Feminist cultural studies, sport, and technologies of the body. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 17, 77–97. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cole, C.L. (1998). Addiction, exercise, and cyborgs: Technologies and deviant bodies. In G. Rail (Ed.) Sport and postmodern times (pp. 261–275). Albany: State University of New York Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Csordas, T. (1994). Embodiment and experience: The existential ground of culture and self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Davis, R, & Cooper, R. (1999). Technology for disabilities. British Medical Journal , 13, 1–4. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • DePauw, K.P. (1997). The (in)visibility of disability: Cultural contexts and “sporting bodies. ” Quest, 49(4), 416–430. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • DesGroseillers, J.-P., Desjardins, J.-P., Germain, J.-P., & Krol, A. L. (1978). Dermatologic problems in amputees. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 118, 535–537. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Haller, B. (2000). If they limp, they lead? News representations and the hierarchy of disability images. In D.O. Braithwaite, & T.L. Thompson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and people with disabilities : Research and application (pp. 273–288). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  • Haraway, D.J. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Hoberman, J. (1992). Mortal engines: The science of human performance and the dehumanization of sport. Oxford: The Free Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Howe, P.D. (2006). The role of injury in the organization of paralympic sport. In S. Loland, B. Skirstad, & I. Waddington (Eds.), Pain and injury in sport: Social and ethical analysis (pp. 211–225). London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Howe, P.D. (2007). Integration of Paralympic athletes into athletics Canada. International Journal of Canadian Studies, 35, 134–150. [Google Scholar]
  • Howe, P.D. (2008a). The cultural politics of the Paralympic movement: Through the anthropological Lens. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Howe, P.D. (2008b). The tail is wagging the dog: classification and the paralympic movement. Ethnography, 9(4): 499–518. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Howe, P.D. (2011). Cyborg and supercrip: The Paralympics technology and the (dis) empowerment of disabled athletes. Sociology, 45(5), 868–882. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Howe, P.D., & Jones, C. (2006). Classification of disabled athletes: (Dis)empowering the Paralympic practice community. Sociology of Sport Journal, 23, 29–46. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Howe, P.D., & Parker, A. (2012). Celebrating imperfection: Sport, disability and celebrity culture. Celebrity Studies, 3(3), 270–282. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hudson, E. (2016). Should ‘blade jumper' Markus Rehm be allowed in the Olympics? BBC Sport. [Google Scholar]
  • Hughes, B. (2000). Medicine and the aesthetic invalidation of disabled people. Disability and Society, 4, 555–568. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Hunt-Grubbe, C. (2007). The blade runner generation. London: The Sunday Times. [Google Scholar]
  • Jones, C, & Howe P.D. (2005). Conceptual boundaries of sport for the disabled: Classification and athletic performance. Journal of Philosophy of Sport, 32, 133–146. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Iwakuma, M. (2002). The body as embodiment: An investigation of the body by Merleau-Ponty. In M. Corker, & T. Shakespeare (Eds.), Disability/postmodernity: Embodying disability theory (pp. 76–87). London: Continuum. [Google Scholar]
  • Jönsson, K. (2010). Sport beyond gender and the emergence of cyborg athletes. Sport in Society, 13(2), 249–259. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kama, A. (2004). Supercrips versus the pitiful handicapped: Reception of disabling images by disabled audience members. Communications, 29(4), 447–466. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kelso, P. (2012). Oscar Pistorius knocked out of London 2012 Olympics but his achievements will resound for years to come. The Telegraph. [Google Scholar]
  • Keogh, J.W.L. (2011). Paralympic sport: An emerging area for research and consultancy in sports biomechanics. Sports Biomechanics, 10(3), 234–253. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • MacIntyre, A. (1999). Dependent rational animals: Why human beings need the virtues. Chicago: Open Court. [Google Scholar]
  • Mastro, J.V.M., Burton, A.W., Rosendahl, M., & Sherrill, C. (1996). Attitudes of elite athletes with impairments toward one another: A hierarchy of preference. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 13(2), 197–210. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (Colin Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge (Original work published 1945). [Google Scholar]
  • Morrissey, R. (2008). Fast-moving technology: Prosthetics, physical ability merging in a blur. Chicago Tribune. [Google Scholar]
  • Mott, S. (2000). Impaired logic keeps heroes off the stage. London: The Daily Telegraph. [Google Scholar]
  • Murphy, R.F. (1990). The body silent. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc. [Google Scholar]
  • Rossi, L.F.A. (1974). Rehabilitation following below-knee amputation. Proceeds of the Royal Society of Medicine, 67, 37–38. [Google Scholar]
  • Schell, L.A., & Rodriguez, S. (2001). Subverting bodies/ambivalent representations: Media analysis of Paralympian, Hope Lewellen. Sociology of Sport Journal, 18, 127–135. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Seymour, W. (1998). Remaking the body: Rehabilitation and change. London: Routledge. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sherrill, C. (1999). Disability sport and classification theory: A new era. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 16, 206–215. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sherrill, C., & Williams, T. (1996). Disability and sport: Psychosocial perspectives on inclusion, integration and participation. Sport Science Review, 1, 42–64. [Google Scholar]
  • Shogun, D. (1998). The social construction of disability: The impact of statistics and technology. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 15, 269–277. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Silva, C. F., & Howe, P.D. (2012). The [In]Validity of supercrip representation of Paralympic athletes. Journal for Sport and Social Issues, 36(2), 174–194. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Swartz, L., & Watermayer, B. (2008). Cyborg anxiety: Oscar Pistorius and the boundaries of what it means to be human. Disability and Society, 23(2), 187–190. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Tuscher, A. (2016). Paralympic Champion hopes taking on Greg Rutherford leads to Olympic ticket. The Guardian. [Google Scholar]
  • Tweedy, S.M., & Vanlandewijick, Y.C. (2009). International Paralympic Committee Position Stand - Background and scientific rationale for classification in Paralympic Sport’. British Journal of Sports Medicine. Online, 10, 29. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.